The Best Conversation Intelligence Alternatives to Gong | Airspeed

Your reps are spending time after every call doing work the call already told them to do. Typing summaries. Logging activity. Updating deal stages. Trying to remember what the buyer said about budget. Meanwhile your CRM drifts further from reality, your forecast gets built on guesswork, and coaching stays inconsistent because nobody has time to review recordings.

Gong defined the conversation intelligence category. That’s not in dispute. But in 2026, $200-250 per user per month plus implementation fees is a hard number to justify for a mid-market team that doesn’t need enterprise analytics depth. The question isn’t whether Gong is good, it is, but whether it’s the right tool for your specific problem.

The best Gong alternatives range from lean note-takers like Avoma and Fireflies to execution-first platforms like Airspeed, which analyzes calls and then does the follow-up work automatically. Here’s a fair breakdown.

What the Right Tool Actually Needs to Do

Every tool in this space does three things:

1. Captures the call: records and transcribes it accurately
2. Analyzes it: surfaces topics, talk ratios, competitor mentions, sentiment, and coaching moments
3. Distributes the output: notes, highlights, and summaries to the team and the CRM

Gong is mature and strong across the first two. Where tools increasingly diverge is a fourth step: acting on what the conversation revealed. Does the tool hand your rep a finished follow-up and an updated CRM record, or does it hand them a transcript and a to-do list?

That’s the question worth asking on every demo.

The Best Alternatives in 2026

Chorus (ZoomInfo)

A mature conversation intelligence product now part of the ZoomInfo platform. If your team is already standardized on ZoomInfo’s data and engagement tooling, Chorus gives you tight integration and a single vendor relationship.

Best for: ZoomInfo-native organizations.

Avoma

Avoma focuses on meeting capture, notes, and collaboration at an accessible price point. Popular with teams that want clean, shareable summaries without enterprise overhead.

Best for: Teams that prioritize structured notes over deep analytics.

Fireflies and Fathom

Both are lightweight note-takers that capture and summarize meetings well, often with generous free or low-cost tiers. A sensible entry point when all you need is transcripts and summaries, with no complex CRM requirements.

Best for: Smaller teams and individual reps who mainly want notes.

Jiminny

Jiminny pairs conversation intelligence with coaching features, making it a natural fit for teams that center their workflow on rep development and call review.

Best for: Coaching-led teams.

Airspeed

Airspeed (formerly Glyphic) covers capture and analysis, and then goes further than any of the options above. It records calls, auto-generates meeting notes and call insights within about five minutes, then acts on what it heard:

• Automatically updates Salesforce or HubSpot, syncing the summary, activity log, next steps, contacts, and qualification scores across 20+ fields, with conflict detection that won’t overwrite a human’s more recent edit
• Scores MEDDIC, BANT, and SPICED automatically from the conversation, consistent across every rep, every deal
• Surfaces deal intelligence so managers can see deal health, risk, and blockers grounded in real conversation activity, not rep self-reporting
• Gives reps and managers Ask Airspeed, a natural-language way to query any conversation or deal
• Offers AI coaching (surfacing coaching moments, identifying what top performers do, generating scorecards) plus AI Sales Roleplay for faster rep ramp

Airspeed uses multiple LLMs (Claude, GPT, and Gemini) for accuracy, is SOC 2 Type II certified and HIPAA compliant, and holds a 4.9 rating on G2.

Best for: Mid-market teams that want call analysis plus automated CRM execution, estimated to start around $5K/year.

Engagement Platforms With Conversation Features

Salesloft and Outreach are engagement platforms that have layered conversation intelligence into their broader sequence and deal workflows. If your team’s center of gravity is engagement, these may cover enough without a standalone tool. The trade-off: conversation intelligence is a secondary feature for both, so the depth of analysis and quality of summaries won’t match a dedicated platform. If you already own one of these, audit what conversation features you’re actually paying for before adding another subscription.

What Happens After the Call Is Now the Real Differentiator

Most conversation intelligence tools are now genuinely good at capture and analysis. Transcripts are accurate. Summaries are usable. Highlights are easy to share. That means the meaningful difference is downstream: does the tool do the work after the call, or does it create more work?

A tool that stops at analysis still leaves your reps logging activity, updating fields, scoring the deal, and drafting the recap after every single call. A tool that acts on the conversation removes that work. For a team running dozens of calls a week, that difference compounds into hours saved per rep, a CRM your managers can trust, and a forecast that reflects what buyers actually said.

How to Choose

Match the tool to how far you need the conversation to travel:

• Just notes and summaries → Avoma, Fireflies, or Fathom
• Analytics inside the ZoomInfo world → Chorus
• Coaching-led workflow → Jiminny
• Call analysis that also updates the CRM and scores qualification → Airspeed
• Already on an engagement platform → check its built-in conversation features first

Three questions to ask any vendor before you sign:

1. How fast are insights and CRM fields ready after a call? (Airspeed: about five minutes.)
2. Does it update the CRM automatically, or stop at a transcript?
3. How does it keep summaries accurate across different accents and products? (Airspeed uses multiple LLMs.)

Gong remains a strong, mature choice for analytics-led enterprise teams. But conversation intelligence is increasingly judged by what happens after the call, and that’s where the newer Gong alternatives earn their place. For a direct comparison, see Airspeed vs Gong.